Back to the radar Cybersecurity

With open-weight AI, more of the security burden falls on enterprises

Organizations that run open-weight AI models on their own infrastructure may have to supply safety and security controls that an AI provider would otherwise handle for them, Microsoft and NVIDIA warn in a joint paper on managing the risks of these models.

Organizations that run open-weight AI models on their own infrastructure may have to supply safety and security controls that an AI provider would otherwise handle for them, Microsoft and NVIDIA warn in a joint paper on managing the risks of these models.

In context

  • Topic: Ciberseguridad — Riesgo, identidad, respuesta a incidentes y cumplimiento.
  • Source: Help Net Security
  • Published: 19/10/2026

Continue reading at the original source →

Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.

Why it matters

In security the story is rarely the attack. It is the time between the intrusion and somebody noticing. That number says more about an organisation than any certificate hanging on the reception wall.

I separate technical risk from business risk, because they do not always match. A critical vulnerability in an isolated system matters less than a medium one in the system that issues invoices. Prioritising by severity without looking at where the money is is an expensive way to work hard and protect little.

What usually goes wrong

Where it usually breaks is response, not prevention. There are tools, there are alerts, and when something real happens nobody knows who decides to disconnect, who gets called first, or what the customer is told. Valuable hours get lost arguing about that while the problem grows.

What to watch

  • Whether third parties or suppliers were in the chain, because the perimeter now includes partners.
  • How long it took to detect, usually the most revealing metric in the whole case.
  • Whether initial access came from a legitimate account handled badly, which is the most frequent pattern.

How I read this entry

I would use it for a conversation with the board, not with the technical team. The question you must be able to answer there is how long the business can operate without its systems and what each day of that outage costs. With that number, the security budget gets discussed differently.

This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Share

Comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Plain text only, no links. No email is requested. Comments are reviewed before they are published.

Living through this in your own team?

Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.

Keep reading

More entries from the radar

See all
Darinel Ortega Online · I reply during the day
Today
Hello. I'm not selling anything here: this is for exchanging knowledge about technology.
Write whatever you like — you can send text, images or documents. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

An open conversation to share knowledge. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

Let us book a conversation

Pick the day and time that work for you. Thirty minutes, no sales pitch.

Video call

For a video call, just ask for one here and I'll send you the session link.