Back to the radar IT Strategy and Governance

Ayesa Digital avanza en IA con la compra de Kuik Digital Solutions

Su equipo de más de 70 profesionales aporta capacidades en ingeniería de software, IA, datos, DevOps y transformación digital.

Su equipo de más de 70 profesionales aporta capacidades en ingeniería de software, IA, datos, DevOps y transformación digital.

En contexto

  • Tema: Estrategia y Gobierno de TI — Decisiones de portafolio, costo total, gobierno y marcos de referencia.
  • Fuente: Silicon España
  • Publicado: 07/10/2026

Seguir leyendo en la fuente original →

Extracto publicado automáticamente por el radar del sitio. El texto completo pertenece a su medio y se enlaza arriba.

Why it matters

When an organisation announces a turn like this, the announcement is rarely the interesting part. What matters is everything it forces to be reordered underneath: committed budgets, live contracts, teams built for something else. That is where you find out whether the decision had real backing or was a slide in a deck.

I read it looking for coordination cost. Every technology decision splits work across areas that do not report to each other, and that is where the return leaks out. If nobody defined who resolves it when two areas disagree, the project already has its grounding date set.

What usually goes wrong

The classic mistake is confusing the plan with the execution. A three-year roadmap gets approved in a two-hour committee and nobody revisits it until there is a problem. Plans that work get reviewed every quarter and corrected without drama; the ones that do not get defended instead.

What to watch

  • How the relationship with current vendors is left, which is usually where the dependency nobody measured is sitting.
  • Who ends up owning the decision, and with what budget of their own rather than borrowed.
  • Whether business metrics appear or only delivery metrics — cost per transaction beats percentage complete.

How I read this entry

If this landed on my desk, the first thing I would ask for is not a plan. It is an honest inventory of what is already running and what it costs to keep it alive. It almost always turns out that the budget for the new thing comes from switching off something old that nobody wants to name, and that conversation decides whether the project lives.

The original story is published in another language; the excerpt is quoted as the publisher delivers it and the commentary is written in English.
Share

Comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Plain text only, no links. No email is requested. Comments are reviewed before they are published.

Living through this in your own team?

Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.

Keep reading

More entries from the radar

See all
Darinel Ortega Online · I reply during the day
Today
Hello. I'm not selling anything here: this is for exchanging knowledge about technology.
Write whatever you like — you can send text, images or documents. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

An open conversation to share knowledge. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

Let us book a conversation

Pick the day and time that work for you. Thirty minutes, no sales pitch.

Video call

For a video call, just ask for one here and I'll send you the session link.